DEMOCRACY AND DIVERSITY
NCERT TEXTBOOK QUESTIONS
Q.1. Discuss three factors that determine the outcomes of politics of social
divisions.
Ans. First :
It
depends on how people see their identities. Are they Irish first and then
Protestant
and Catholics? Are they
Belgians or Dutch-speaking and French-speaking first? Are we Indians
or Bengali or Punjabi, Hindu
or Muslim? If people realise they have multiple identities and
give precedence to the
national identity, there will be no trouble in the country.
Second :
It
also depends on how political parties support the claims or raise the demands of
any community. The demand to
give importance only to ‘Sinhala language’ and ‘Buddhism’ at
the cost of Tamil-speaking
Hindus and Muslims has led to civil war in Sri Lanka.
Third :
The
attitude of the government and its reaction to demands of different communities
also affect the outcomes. In
Belgium, or Netherlands, the government was willing to share
power with different ethnic
groups unlike Sri Lanka or Yugoslavia.
Thus, in a democracy, it is
considered healthy to have political expressions of social divisions.
It allows those who are at a
disadvantage or marginalized to express their grievances. It
strengthens and deepens
democracy. It is not easy for those in power to accommodate other
groups but democracy shows us the path how to
fight for equality and justice.
Q.2. When does a social difference become a social division?
Ans.
A
social difference becomes a social division when it overlaps with some other
social
difference. For example, the
Whites were rich and powerful and the Blacks were poor and
homeless and discriminated
against. When one kind of social difference becomes more
important than the other, then
it leads to division.
Q.3. How do social divisions affect politics? Give two examples.
Ans.
In
politics, there is competition between political parties. If these political
parties use this
competition in support of some
social divisions, it can lead to political divisions. This can lead
to conflict, violence or even
disintegration of a country.
(i) One example is of Northern
Ireland where religious divisions led to ethno-political
conflict. Two major sects of
Christianity : 53% Protestants and 44% Catholics dominate
the country. The Catholics
wanted Northern Ireland to join the Republic of Ireland and the
Protestants wanted to remain
with UK. This led to years of violence where thousands were
killed. Only in 1998, peace
returned when the UK government and the Nationalists reached
a peace treaty and stopped all
violence.
(ii) The second example is of
Yugoslavia where the political parties refused to accommodate
each other. Each
ethno-religious group wanted to dominate the other. Result –
disintegration of Yugoslavia
into seven independent countries.
Q.4. Fill in the blanks :
______________ social
differences create possibilities of deep social divisions and tensions.
_____________ social
differences do not usually lead to conflicts.
Ans.
Overlapping; Cross-cutting.
Q.5. In dealing with social divisions which one of the following statements is
NOT correct
about democracy?
A. Due to political
competition in a democracy, social divisions get reflected in politics.
B. In a democracy, it is
possible for communities to voice their grievances in a peaceful
manner.
C. Democracy is the best way
to accommodate social diversity.
D. Democracy always leads to
disintegration of society on the basis of social divisions.
Ans.
(d)
Democracy always leads to disintegration of society on the basis of social
divisions.
Q.6. Consider the following three statements.
A. Social divisions take place
when social differences overlap.
B. It is possible that a
person can have multiple identities.
C. Social divisions exist in
only big countries like India.
Which of the statements is/are
correct?
(a) A, B and C (b) A and B
(c) B and C (d) Only C
Ans.
(b)
Q.7. Arrange the following statements in a logical sequence and select the right
answers by
using the code given below :
A. But all the political
expression of social divisions need not be always dangerous.
B. Social divisions of one
kind or the other exist in most countries.
C. Parties try to win
political support by appealing to social divisions.
D. Some social differences may
result in social divisions.
(a) DBCA (b) DBAC
(c) DACB (d) ABCD
Ans.
(b)
Q.8. Among the following, which country suffered disintegration due to political
fights on the
basis of religious and ethnic identities?
(a) Belgium (b) India
(c) Yugoslavia (d) Netherland
Ans.
(c)
Q.9. Read the following passage from a famous speech by Martin Luther King Jr.
in 1963.
Which social division is he talking about? What are his aspirations and
anxieties? Do you
see a relationship between this speech and the incident in Mexico Olympics
mentioned in
this chapter?
“I have a dream that my four
little children will one day live in a nation where they will not
be judged by the colour of
their skin but by the content of their character. Let freedom ring.
And when this happens, and
when we allow freedom ring — when we let it ring from every
village and every hamlet, from
every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day
when all of God’s
children—Black men and White men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and
Catholics — will be able to
join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual : ‘Free
at last! Free at last! Thank
God Almighty, we are free at last!’ I have a dream that one day this
nation will rise up and live
out the true meaning of its creed : ‘We hold these truths to be
self-evident : that all men
are created equal’.”
Ans.
The social division he is talking about is of racism. American society has
been divided into
Black and White races, where
the Blacks are discriminated against because of the colour
of their skin.
His aspirations are for his
children and citizens of America to live in a country which is
truly free — free of
prejudices of colour and race, religion, gender and class, where
everyone is equal. He does not
want his people or his children to be judged because of
colour of their skin but
appreciated or condemned because of their character.
He wants all American
citizens to believe that “all men are created equal and it’s only the
strength of our character that
makes us better than others. “Free at last” is to be free of all
prejudices, social divisions
that affect a person’s life.
What Martin Luther is asking
is equality for Blacks, same opportunities as the Whites to
rise in life. The two
Americans (Tommie Smith and John Carlos) who protested at the
Mexico Olympics were doing the
same — asking for equality, respect and same
opportunities, and making the
world aware of the condition of the Blacks in USA, the
injustice done to them, their poverty, their
struggle for freedom from racial prejudice.
MULTIPLE CHOICE
QUESTIONS
Q.1. When did the
Civil Rights Movement take place in USA?
(a) 1953-1958 (b) 1954-1968 (c) 1960-1978 (d)
1946-1968
Ans.
(b)
Q.2. Which of
these sentences is not correct about the “Black Power Movement”?
(a) It emerged in 1966 (b) It lasted till 1975
(c) It was a more militant movement (d) It
advocated peaceful methods
Ans.
(d)
Q.3. What was
special about the 1968 Olympics held at Mexico city?
(a) All the Gold Medals went to US athletes
(b) Protest by African-American athletes against
the racial discrimination of African-
Americans
(c) Mexico City supported the demand
(d) US government announced the end of racism
Ans.
(b)
Q.4. Who led the
Civil Rights Movement in USA?
(a) Martin Luther (b) Martin Luther King Jr
(c) Martin Davis (d) Benjamin Franklin
Ans.
(b)
Q.5. How did the
San Jose State University honour Tommie Smith and Carlos?
(a) By giving them bravery awards
(b) By installing their statues in the University
campus
(c) By starting a sports organization in their
name
(d) By giving them jobs
Ans.
(b)
Q.6. Which of
these sentences is correct?
(a) Every social difference does not lead to
social division
(b) Social differences divide similar people from
one another
(c) They also unite very different people (d) All
the above
Ans.
(d)
Q.7. Which of the
communities in India was in a more or less similar position as that of Blacks
in USA?
(a) Brahmins (b) Dalits (c) Vaishyas (d)
Kshatriyas
Ans.
(b)
Q.8. Name the
prominent religious group in Northern Ireland and the Netherlands.
(a) Judaism (b) Christianity (c) Islam (d) None
of the above
Ans.
(b)
Q.9. Which of
these is incorrect about the Catholic Christians of Northern Ireland?
(a) They are likely to be poor.
(b) They may have suffered a history of
discrimination.
(c) Catholics have lived peacefully with
Protestants.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(c)
Q.10. What is the
society with similar kinds of people called?
(a) Homogeneous (b) Heterogenous (c) Humane (d)
Humble
Ans.
(a)
Q.11. Which of
these sentences is not false?
(a) Migrants bring with them their own culture.
(b) They tend to form a different social
community.
(c) They help in making the world multicultural.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.12. Which of
these sentences is not true?
(a) Democracy involves competition among various
political parties.
(b) Their competition tends to unite the country
if they compete in terms of existing social
divisions.
(c) Social divisions change into political
divisions and lead to conflict, violence etc.
(d) It can even lead to the disintegration of the
country.
Ans.
(b)
Q.13. The
percentage of Protestant Christians in Northern Ireland is :
(a) 52 (b) 53 (c) 54 (d) 55
Ans.
(b)
Q.14. Which of
these sentences is correct?
(a) The Catholics in Northern Ireland were
represented by Nationalist parties.
(b) They demanded thet Northern Ireland should be
unified with the Republic of Ireland.
(c) Republic of Ireland was a predominantly
Catholic country.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.15. Which of
these is true about the Protestants of Northern Ireland?
(a) They were represented by the Unionist Party.
(b) They wanted to remain with UK.
(c) Both (a) and (b). (d) None of the above.
Ans.
(c)
Q.16. When did the
Nationalists and the UK government arrive at an agreement?
(a) 1992 (b) 1995 (c) 1998 (d) 1999
Ans.
(c)
Q.17. Which of
these sentences is correct in relation to Yugoslavia?
(a) There was
political competition along religious and ethnic lines.
(b) This led to the disintegration of Yugoslavia.
(c) As a result, seven independent countries have
come to be set up.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.18. Fill in the
blanks.
It is easier if the people see that their
identities are _____ and are _______ to national
identity.
(a) Single, contrary (b) Multiple, complementary
(c) Single, complementary (d) Multiple, contrary
Ans.
(b)
Q.19. A majority
of Belgians feel that they are as much Belgians as they are Dutch or
Germanspeaking.
What does it
mean?
(a) They have lost their individual identity.
(b) This helps them to stay together.
(c) They are not happy with this arrangement.
(d) None of the above.
Ans.
(b)
Q.20. Which of
these are examples of not accommodating other communities’ demands?
(a) Sri Lanka (b) Yugoslavia (c) Belgium (d) (a)
and (b)
Ans.
(d)
Q.21. Fill in the
blanks.
A factor crucial in deciding the outcome of
politics of social divisions is how the _____ react
to the demands of different groups.
(a) Political parties (b) Governments (c)
Communities (d) Judges
Ans.
(b)
Q.22. Dealing
with social divisions, which one of the following statements is not correct
about
democracy?
(a) Democracy is the best way to accommodate
social diversity.
(b) Democracy always leads to disintegration of
society on the basis of social divisions.
(c) In a democracy, it is possible for
communities to voice their grievances in a peaceful
manner.
(d) Due to political competition in a democracy,
social divisions get reflected in politics.
Ans.
(b)
Q.23. Look at the
following sentences—
(i) Social divisions take place when social
differences overlap.
(ii) It is possible that a person can have
multiple identities.
(iii) Social divisions exist in only big
countries like India.
Which of the statements is/are correct?
(a) (i), (ii) and (iii) (b) (i) and (ii) (c) (ii)
and (iii) (d) only (iii)
Ans.
(b)
Q.24. Which of
these statements is correct?
(a) The assertion of social diversities in a
country need not be seen as a source of danger.
(b) Political expression of social divisions is
very normal.
(c) It allows disadvantaged groups to express
their grievances.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(a)
PREVIOUS YEARS’ QUESTIONS
Q.1. When did the Civil Rights Movement take place in USA?
(a) 1953-1958 (b) 1954-1968
(c) 1960-1978 (d) 1946-1968
Ans.
(b)
Q.2. Which of these sentences is not correct about the “Black Power Movement”?
(a) It emerged in 1966 (b) It
lasted till 1975
(c) It was a more militant
movement (d) It advocated peaceful methods
Ans.
(d)
Q.3. What was special about the 1968 Olympics held at Mexico City?
(a) All the Gold Medals went
to US athletes
(b) Protest by
African-American athletes against the racial discrimination of African-Americans
(c) Mexico City supported the
demand
(d) US government announced
the end of racism
Ans.
(b)
Q.4. Who led the Civil Rights Movement in USA?
(a) Martin Luther (b) Martin
Luther King Jr
(c) Martin Davis (d) Benjamin
Franklin
Ans.
(b)
Q.5. How did the San Jose State University honour Tommie Smith and Carlos?
(a) By giving them bravery
awards
(b) By installing their
statues in the University campus
(c) By starting a sports
organization in their name
(d) By giving them jobs
Ans.
(b)
Q.6. Which of these sentences is correct?
(a) Every social difference
does not lead to social division
(b) Social differences divide
similar people from one another
(c) They also unite very
different people (d) All the above
Ans.
(a)
Q.7. Which of the communities in India was in a more or less similar position as
that of Blacks
in USA?
(a) Brahmins (b) Dalits (c)
Vaishyas (d) Kshatriyas
Ans.
(b)
Q.8. Name the prominent religious group in Northern Ireland and the Netherlands.
(a) Judaism (b) Christianity
(c) Islam (d) None of the above
Ans.
(b)
Q.9. Which of these is incorrect about the Catholic Christians of Northern
Ireland?
(a) They are likely to be
poor.
(b) They may have suffered a
history of discrimination.
(c) Catholics have lived
peacefully with Protestants.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.10. What is the society with similar kinds of people called?
(a) Homogeneous (b)
Heterogenous (c) Humane (d) Humble
Ans.
(a)
Q.11. Which of these sentences is not false?
(a) Migrants bring with them
their own culture.
(b) They tend to form a
different social community.
(c) They help in making the
world multicultural.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.12. Which of these sentences is not true?
(a) Democracy involves
competition among various political parties.
(b) Their competition tends to
unite the country if they compete in terms of existing social
divisions.
(c) Social divisions change
into political divisions and lead to conflict, violence etc.
(d) It can even lead to the
disintegration of the country.
Ans.
(d)
Q.13. The percentage of Protestant Christians in Northern Ireland is :
(a) 52 (b) 53 (c) 54 (d) 55
Ans.
(b)
Q.14. Which of these sentences is correct?
(a) The Catholics in northern
Ireland were represented by Nationalist parties.
(b) They demanded thet
Northern Ireland should be unified with the Republic of Ireland.
(c) Republic of Ireland was a
predominantly Catholic country.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.15. Which of these is true about the Protestants of Northern Ireland?
(a) They were represented by
the Unionist Party.
(b) They wanted to remain with
UK.
(c) Both (a) and (b).
(d) None of the above.
Ans.
(c)
Q.16.
When did the Nationalists and the UK government arrive at an agreement?
(a) 1992 (b) 1995 (c) 1998 (d)
1999
Ans.
(c)
Q.17. Which of these sentences is correct in relation to Yugoslavia?
(a) There was political
competition along religious and ethnic lines.
(b) This led to the
disintegration of Yugoslavia.
(c) As a result, six
independent countries have come to be set up.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
Q.18. Which of these are examples of not accommodating other communities’
demands?
(a) Sri Lanka (b) Yugoslavia
(c) Belgium (d) (a) and (b)
Ans.
(d)
Q.19. Dealing with social divisions, which one of the following statements is
not correct about
democracy?
(a) Democracy is the best way
to accommodate social diversity.
(b) Democracy always leads to
disintegration of society on the basis of social divisions.
(c) In a democracy, it is
possible for communities to voice their grievances in a peaceful
manner.
(d) Due to political
competition in a democracy, social divisional get reflected impolite.
Ans.
(d)
Q.20. Which of these statements is correct?
(a) The assertion of social
diversities in a country need not be seen as a source of danger.
(b) Political expression of
social divisions is very normal.
(c) It allows disadvantaged
groups to express their grievances.
(d) All the above.
Ans.
(d)
SHORT ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS
Q.1. What could be the two possible outcomes of politics of social divisions?
Ans.
The
two outcomes are :
(i) Political divisions could
lead to violence and disintegration of a country. Example :
Yugoslavia.
(ii) They could be amicably
settled in a democracy where rulers share power, and people think
of themselves as nationalists
and then as belonging to a religious or ethnic or linguistic
group. Example : India.
Q.2. When does a social difference become a social division?
Ans.
Social division takes place when some social differences overlap with other
differences. For
example, the difference
between the Blacks and Whites becomes a social division in the US
because the Blacks tend to be
poor, homeless and discriminated against. Similarly, in our
country, Dalits tend to be
poor and landless.
Q.3. Is the combination of social division with politics always explosive?
Substantiate with
examples from India. [HOTS]
Ans.
The
combination of social division with politics is not always explosive. Rather in
a
democracy, political
expression of social divisions is very normal and healthy. This allows
various disadvantaged and
marginal social groups to express their grievances and get the
government to attend to these.
This leads to the strengthening of democracy.
Q.4. Discuss the ways is which social divisions are reflected in a democracy.
Ans.
(i)
In a democracy, it is natural that political parties talk about the social
divisions and make
different promises to
different communities.
(ii) They look after the
representation of various communities and make policies to redress
the grievances of the
disadvantaged communities.
(iii) Social divisions affect
voting in most countries. People from one community tend to
prefer some party more than
others.
PREVIOUS YEARS’ QUESTIONS
Q.1. “We all have more than one identity and can belong to more than one social
group.”
Discuss the statement with suitable examples.
Ans.
It
is fairly common for people belonging to the same religion to feel that they do
not belong
to the same community, because
their caste or sect is very different. It is also possible for
people from different
religions to have the same caste and feel close to each other. Rich and
poor persons from the same
family often do not keep close relations with each other for they
feel they are different.
Example – Carlos and Smith were similar in one way that they both
were Afro-American and thus
different from Norman who was white. But they were all athletes
who stood against racial
discrimination. Thus we all have more than one social group.
Q.2. Discuss two reasons why differences occur in society. Give an example to
show that social
differences do not lead to social division.
Ans.
The
social differences are mostly based on accident of birth. Normally we do not
choose to
belong to our community. We
belong to it simply because we were born into it. People around
us are male or female, they
are tall or short, having different complexion or have different
physical abilities or
disabilities. But all kind of social differences are not based on accident of
birth. Some of the differences
are based on our choices. Example – some people are atheists.
They don’t believe in god or
any religion. All these lead to formation of social groups that are
based on our choices.
Every social difference does
not lead to social division. Social differences divide similar
people from one another, but
they also unite very different people.
Q.3. What are the features of a homogeneous society? Mention the name of any one
country
having such society?
Ans.
Homogenous society is a kind of society that has similar kinds of people,
especially where
there are no significant
ethnic differences. But these kinds of society are rare, even those
countries such as Germany and
Sweden that were once highly homogenous are undergoing
rapid change with influx of
people from other parts of the world. Migrants bring with them
their own culture and tend to
form a different social community. In this sense, most countries
of the world are multicultural.
Q.4. What was the Black Power movement? Explain.
Ans.
The
Black power movement emerged in 1966 and lasted till 1975, which was a more
militant
anti-racist movement,
advocating even violence, if necessary, to end racism in U.S. This
movement became speedy after
Olympics of Mexico city in 1968. In it US athletes Tommie
Smiths and John Carlos are
Afro-American won the gold and bronze medal respectively. They
received their medals while
wearing black socks and no shoes to represent Black poveery. With
this gesture they tried to
draw international attention to racial discrimination in the U.S. Their
action succeeded in gaining
international attention for the civil right movement in the U.S.
Recently the San Jose State
University of which they were former students, honoured them and
installed their statue in the
university campus.
Q.5. Explain any three elements that show the diversity in India.
Ans.
The
elements that show the diversity in India –
(i) India is a land which gave
birth to four religions – Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and
Sikhism. Muslims also lived in
India having a good population.
(ii) Caste system of India is
unique like Indian population is divided into Brahmin, Kshatriya,
Vaisya and Shudra.
(iii) Different kinds of
dances are there in India like Kathak, Bharat Natyam, Odyssi, Kathakali
and Bhangra.
Q.6. How were Civil Rights Movement and the Black Power movement different from
each
other?’’ Give three features of each.
Ans.
Civil rights movement in the US (1954 – 1968) refers to a set of events and
reform movements
aimed at abolishing legal
racial discrimination against Afro-Americans. Led by Martin Luther
King Jr, this movement
practised non-violent methods of civil disobedience against racially
discriminatory laws and
practices.
Afro-American, Black American
or Black are the terms used to refer mainly to the descendants
of Africans, who were brought
into America as slaves between the 17th century and early 19th
century.
The Black power movement
emerged in 1966 and lasted till 1975, which was a more militant,
anti-racist movement,
advocating even violence, if necessary, to end racism in the U.S.
Q.7. How far is it correct to say that social divisions exist in only big
countries like India?
Explain.
Ans.
It
is not correct to say that social divisions exist in only big countries like
India. Here we can
take the example of Belgium.
The ethnic composition of this small country is very complex.
Of the country’s total
population, 59% live in the Flemish region and speaks Dutch language.
Another 40% live in the
Wallonia region and speak French. Remaining 1% of the Belgians
speak German. In the capital
like Brussels, 80% people speak French while 20% are Dutch speaking.
Q.8. “We have different identities in different contexts.” Support the statement
with three facts.
Ans.
(i)
It is common for people belonging to the same religion to feel that they do not
belong
to the same community, because their caste or
sect is different.
(ii) It is also possible for
people from different religions to have the same caste and feel close
to each other.
(iii) Rich and poor people
from the same family often do not keep close relations with each
other because they feel they
are very different.
Thus, we have different
identities in different contexts.
Q.9. How is political expression of social divisions in democracy beneficial?
Ans.
In
a democracy political expression of social division is very normal and healthy.
This allows
various disadvantaged and
marginal groups to express their grievances and get the government
to attend to these. Expression
of various kinds of social divisions in politics often results in
their cancelling one another
out and thus reducing their intensity. This leads to strengthening
of a democracy.
Q.10. What did the African-American athletes in Mexico Olympics do in order to
draw
international attention to social discrimination in the United States?
Ans.
In
the 1968 Olympics held at Maxico City two US African-American athletes named
Tommie
Smith and John Carlos won gold
and bronze medals respectively. During the medal ceremony,
they stood with clenched fists
upraised and heads bowed when the national anthem was being
played. They also wore black
shocks and no shoes to show the stark poverty among the black
community. With this gesture,
they tried to draw international attention to racial discrimination
in the United States. The
black gloved and raised clenched fists were meant to symbolise Black
power.
LONG ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS
Q.1. Discuss the various factors that determine the outcomes of politics of
social division.
Ans.
(i)
All the outcomes depend on how people perceive their identities. If people see
their
identities in singular and
exclusive terms, it becomes very difficult to accommodate. It is
much better if the people see
that their identities are multiple and are complementary
with the national identity.
For example, in our country people think of themselves as Indians
as well as belonging to a
state or a language group or a social or religious community.
(ii) It depends on how
political leaders raise the demands of any community. It is easier to
accommodate demand that are
within the constitutional framework and are not at the cost
of another community. The
demand for ‘only Sinhala’ was at the cost of the interest and
identity of the Tamil
community in Sri Lanka.
(iii) It depends on how the
government reacts to the demands of different groups. If the
government is willing to share
power and accommodate the reasonable demands of the
minority community, social
divisions become less threatening for the country, as it
happened in the case of
Belgium.
Q.2. Discuss the ethnic problem in Northern Ireland, its outcome and settlement.
Ans.
The
population of Northern Ireland is divided into two major sects of Christianity :
53 per cent
are Protestants, while 44 per
cent are Roman Catholics. For years, this region of United
Kingdom has been the site of a
violent ethno-political conflict. The Catholics were represented
by Nationalist parties, who demanded that
Northern Ireland be unified with the Republic of
Ireland, a predominantly
Catholic country. The Protestants were represented by Unionists, who
wanted to remain with the UK
which is predominantly Protestant. Hundreds of civilians,
militants and security forces
were killed in the fight between the Unionists and Nationalists
and between the security
forces of the UK and the Nationalists. It was only in 1998, that the
UK government and the
Nationalists reached a peace treaty, after which the latter suspended
their armed struggle.
Q.3. Why is it said that a positive attitude towards diversity and a willingness
to accommodate
it do not come about easily?
Ans.
This is so because people who feel marginalized, deprived and discriminated have
to fight
against the injustices. But
when such a fight takes the democratic path, demands are made in
a peaceful manner based on
constitutional methods. But sometimes social differences can
take the form of unacceptable
level of social inequality and injustice. The struggle against
such inequalities sometimes
takes the path of violence and defiance of state power. However,
it is proved by history that
democracy is the best way to fight for recognition and to
accommodate diversity.
Q.4. How did the Olympic Committee react to the protests of the African-American
athletes?
Do you think they were justified? What would you have done?
Ans.
The
Olympic Committee took back the medals from the two athletes. They declared that
it was
against the spirit of the
Olympics to make a political protest.
I do not think the protest
made by Carlos and Smith was political. They had done it to make
the international community
take cognizance of Civil Rights Movement in America. It needed
a lot of courage to do so and
they had to sacrifice their medals. But the action of the Olympic
Committee was also justified.
Sports are meant to unite people as a world community and
cannot become a platform for
airing differences, whether political or social. It would have
spoilt the atmosphere of the
games.
The world realized later that
it was not a political gesture, is seen in San Jose State University
installing 92 foot high
sculpture representing the protest of Smith and Carlos in 2005.
Q.5. Write a brief note on two kinds of social differences.
Ans.
(i)
Generally, social differences are based on accident of birth. We do not choose
our religion,
we are born to it. It depends
on the religion followed by our family. Our looks, our physical
attributes, our complexions,
our gender, or even our abilities and disabilities are not based
on our choice. The friends,
neighbors, all depend on the family we are born into.
(ii) The second difference is
based on our choices. For example, (i) We may not believe in any
God or religion and become an
atheist by choice. (ii) We may even change our religion
when we grow up. (iii) We have
the choice to choose our own area of study, different from
that of our parents, we may
choose a different occupation, different cultural activities.
These differences lead to
formation of different social groups based on our choices.
Q.6. Refer to ‘I have a Dream’ speech of Martin Luther King. Describe his dream.
Has all of
his dream been fulfilled? [HOTS]
Ans.
His
dream was to end the social division created by the discrimination of blacks by
the whites.
He dreamt of America which
would be free of all prejudices of colour and race, religion,
gender and class, and where everyone would be
equal. His aspirations were that his children
and the citizens of America
should live in a country where they should not be judged by their
colour but by their character.
Through the Civil Rights
Movement in USA and various incidents like the one at Mexico
Olympics, efforts have been
made to attract international attention to it. The legal – racial
discrimination has been
abolished against the African-Americans and Blacks are also provided
with the same opportunities,
the mindset of people may take some more time to change.
However, the waves of change
are already evident in the election of Barack Obama, a Black,
for the post of President of
America.
Q.7. Describe the episode of the Mexico Olympics which took place is 1968. Do
you think the
athletes were justified in raising the issue? [HOTS]
Ans.
In
1968 Olympics at Mexico City, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, the US athletes won
gold
and bronze medals
respectively. During the medal ceremony, they stood with clenched fists
upraised and head bowed when
the national anthem was being played. They wore black socks
and no shoes to represent
Black poverty.
Yes, I think they were
justified in raising the issue to the International event because the
poverty and discrimination
being faced by the Black community was not being attended by the
government, there was – legal
racial discrimination against the African-Americans. Their
action succeeded in gaining
international attention for the Civil Rights Movement in the US.
Q.8. What is the difference between overlapping social differences and
cross-cutting social
differences?
Ans.
Overlapping social difference refers to the situation when one kind of social
difference
becomes more important than
the other and people start feeling that they belong to different
communities. For example, the
difference between the Blacks and Whites in the US is
overlapping because the Blacks
tend to be poor, homeless and discriminated against. These
overlapping differences create
possibilities of deep social divisions and tensions. On the other
hand, cross-cutting social
differences are easier to accommodate. For example, in Netherlands,
class and religion tend to cut
across each other. Catholics and Protestants are about equally
likely to be rich or poor. So
there are no conflicts between the two communities there.
PREVIOUS YEARS’ QUESTIONS
Q.1. “Some people conclude that politics and social divisions should not be
allowed to mix.”
Support this idea with two arguments.
Ans.
It
is true that politics and social divisions should not be allowed to mix. It
leads to negative
results. We can see this when
caste starts influencing politics –
(i) Each caste group tries to
become bigger by incorporating within it new kinds of
neighboring castes or sub
castes which it had excluded earlier. New kinds of caste groups
like backward and forward
emerge. This is not healthy for democracy and can lead to
tensions, conflicts and even
violence. It diverts attention from other pressing issues like
poverty, development and
corruption.
(ii) Political parties and
candidates in elections make appeals to caste sentiment to minister
support. Some political parties are known to
favor some castes and are seen as their
representatives. This is bad,
because it gives the impression that elections are about castes
and nothing else. This is far
from true.
Q.2. How do social divisions affect politics? Explain with examples.
Ans.
At
first, it appears that the combination of politics and social divisions is very
dangerous.
Democracy involves competition
among various political parties. Their competition tends to
divide any society. If they
start competing in terms of some existing social divisions, it can
make social divisions into
political divisions and lead to conflict, violence or even
disintegration of a country.
In Northern Ireland there was
a violent ethno-political conflict between Catholics and
Protestants and the
government. Similarly, in Yugoslavia, political competition along religious
and ethnic lines led to the
disintegration of Yugoslavia into six independent countries. But
every expression of social
divisions in politics does not lead to disasters. In a democracy, it
is only natural that political
parties would talk about these divisions, make different promises
to different communities and
make policies to redress the grievances of the disadvantaged
communities. Yet all this does not lead to the
disintegration of the country.