Power Sharing

POWER SHARING

NCERT TEXTBOOK QUESTIONS

Q.1. What are the different forms of power-sharing in modern democracies? Give one example of each of these.

Ans. (i) Power is shared among different organs of the government, such as the legislature, executive and judiciary. For example, Indian political system.

(ii) Power is shared among governments at central, provincial and local level (municipality and panchayat). In India, power is shared among Central government, State governments and local self-government.

(iii) Power may also be shared among different social groups, such as the religious and linguistic groups. ‘Community government’ in Belgium is a good example of this arrangement.

(iv) Power-sharing arrangements can also be seen in the many political parties, pressure groups

and movements control or influence those in power. In contemporary democracies, this takes the form of competition among different parties.

Q.2. State one prudential and one moral reason in favour of power-sharing, with an example from the Indian context.

Ans. Power-sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between two or more than two social groups or even among those who have power to run the government.

(i) Prudential : In India, seats are reserved for the weaker sections of society. Example : reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. This allows the weaker sections also to participate in the running of the Government.

(ii) Moral : India is a land of many religions. For this reason, all religions are given equal respect and there is no state religion. This is truly in favour of the spirit of democracy.

Q.3. After reading this chapter, three students drew different conclusions. Which of these do you agree with and why? Give your reasons in about 50 words.

Thomman – Power-sharing is necessary only in societies which have religious, linguistic or ethnic divisions.

Mathayi – Power-sharing is suitable only for big countries that have regional divisions.

Ouseph – Every society needs some form of power-sharing even if it is small or does not have social divisions.

Ans. I agree with Ouseph. Even a small country with no ethnic problems (Switzerland) would not like one person to become all-powerful or one group to assume all powers. Power has to be shared otherwise you end up with dictatorship.

Q.4. The Mayor of Merchtem, a town near Brussels in Belgium, has defended a ban on speaking French in the town’s schools. He said that the ban would help all non-Dutch speakers integrate in this Flemish town. Do you think that this measure is in keeping with the spirit of Belgium’s power-sharing arrangements? Give your reasons in about 50 words.

Ans. No, the measure is not in keeping with the spirit of power-sharing arrangements. Though Brussels has a French majority, the Dutch have been given equal representation in the separate government for Brussels. Imposing French language on the Dutch would be violating the power-sharing rules in Brussels.

Q.5. Read the following passage and pick out any one of the prudential reasons for power sharing offered in this.

“We need to give more power to the panchayats to realise the dream of Mahatma Gandhi and

the hopes of the makers of our Constitution. Panchayati Raj establishes true democracy. It

restores power to the only place where power belongs in a democracy — in the hands of the

people. Giving power to Panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase

administrative efficiency. When people participate in the planning and implementation of

devolopmental schemes, they would naturally exercise greater control over these schemes. This

would eliminate the corrupt middlemen Thus, Panchayati Raj will strengthen the foundations

of our democracy.”

Ans. The prudential reason for power sharing offered in this passage is : giving power to panchayats

is also a way to reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency.

Q.6. Consider the following statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri Lanka.

A. In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the minority French-speaking community.

B. In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of Sinhala-speaking majority.

C. The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power-sharing to protect their

culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs.

D. The transformation of Belgium from a unitary government to a federal one prevented a possible division of the country on linguistic lines.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) A, B, C, D (b) A, B, D (c) C and D (d) B, C and D.

Ans. (c)

Q.7. Match List I (forms of power-sharing) with List II (forms of government) and select the

correct answer using the codes given below in the lists :

            List I                                                                                                    List II

1. Power shared among different organs of government                          A. Community government

2. Power shared among governments at different levels                          B. Separation of powers

3. Power shared by different social groups                                               C. Coalition government

4. Power shared by two or more political parties                                      D. Federal government

Ans. (c) 1–B, 2–D, 3–A, 4–C

Q.8. Consider the following two statements on power-sharing and select the answer using the

codes given below :

A. Power sharing is good for democracy.

B. It helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.

(a) A is true but B is false

(b) Both A and B are true

(c) Both A and B are false

(d) A is false but B is true

Ans. (b)

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Q.1. In which part of Sri Lanka are the Sri Lankan Tamils concentrated?

(a) North and South (b) North and East

(c) East and West (d) South and East

Ans. (b)

Q.2. Most of the Sinhala-speaking people are

(a) Buddhists (b) Hindus (c) Muslims (d) Christians

Ans. (a)

Q.3. Which is the capital city of Belgium?

(a) Wallonia (b) Brussels (c) Bonn (d) Paris

Ans. (b)

Q.4. Which language is spoken by the majority of Belgians?

(a) German (b) French (c) Dutch (d) English

Ans. (c)

Q.5. Which language is spoken by 80 per cent people of Brussels?

(a) French (b) Dutch (c) German (d) Latin

Ans. (a)

Q.6. Which of the following is not a major social group in Sri Lanka?

(a) Sinhala-speakers or Sinhala Community (b) Sri Lankan Tamils

(c) Indian Tamils (d) Anglo-Indians

Ans. (d)

Q.7. Which language was declared as the only official language of Sri Lanka by an Act passed in 1956?

(a) Tamil (b) Sinhala (c) Hindi (d) English

Ans. (b)

Q.8. Which is the state religion of Sri Lanka?

(a) Buddhism (b) Hinduism (c) Islam (d) Christianity

Ans. (a)

Q.9. Which of the following was not one of the initial demands of the Sri Lankan Tamils?

(a) Recognition of Tamil as an official language

(b) Regional autonomy

(c) Equality of opportunity in securing jobs and education

(d) Creation of an independent Tamil Eelam (state)

Ans. (d)

Q.10. Which of the following statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium are

correct?

(i) Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be

equal in the central government

(ii) The state governments are not subordinate to the central government

(iii) Brussels has a separate government in which both the communities have equal

representation

(iv) The ‘community government’ is elected by people belonging to one linguistic community.

(a) 1, 2, 4 (b) 1, 2, 3, 4 (c) 1, 3, 4 (d) 1, 2, 3

Ans. (b)

Q.11. Which of the statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri Lanka are correct?

(a) In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the

minority French-speaking people

(b) In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of the

Sinhala-speaking majority

(c) The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power-sharing to protect their

culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs

(d) The transformation of Belgium from a unitary government to a federal one prevented the

division of country on linguistic lines.

Ans. (d)

Q.12. Choose the incorrect statement.

(a) Belgium and Sri Lanka are democracies

(b) Both of them dealt with the question of power-sharing similarly

(c) In Belgium, leaders realised that unity of the country was possible only by respecting the

feelings and interests of all communities

(d) In Sri Lanka, majority community forced its domination over others and refused to share

power.

Ans. (b)

Q.13. What led to tensions between the Dutch-speaking and French-speaking communities in Belgium during the 1950s and 1960s?

(a) Both the communities demanded special powers

(b) The minority French-speaking community was richer and more powerful than the majority

Dutch-speaking community

(c) The majority Dutch-speaking community was richer and more powerful than the minority

French-speaking community

(d) Both the communities were equal in socio-economic ladder and this was resented by the

French-speaking community

Ans. (b)

Q.14. Non-sharing of power leads to

(a) peace among all the communities

(b) tyranny of the majority and oppression of the minority

(c) negation of the very spirit of democracy

(d) both (b) and (c)

Ans. (d)

Q.15. Which is a prudent reason for power-sharing?

(a) It reduces the possibility of conflict between communities and ensures the stability of

political order

(b) Power-sharing is the very spirit of democracy

(c) Both the above

(d) None of the above

Ans. (a)

Q.16. Which of the following is not one of the aspects of federal division of powers?

(a) Sharing of powers among central provincial and local governments

(b) Division of powers involving higher and lower levels of government

(c) The Constitution clearly lays down powers of different levels of government

(d) There is no vertical division of powers

Ans. (d)

Q.17. Which of the following countries have federal division of powers?

(a) India (b) Belgium (c) Sri Lanka (d) Both (a) and (b)

Ans. (d)

Q.18. Which of the following is not one of the three organs of government powers are shared?

(a) Legislature (b) Bureaucracy (c) Executive (d) Judiciary

Ans. (b)

Q.6. Which of the following is not a major social group in Sri Lanka?

(a) Sinhala-speakers or Sinhala Community (b) Sri Lankan Tamils

(c) Indian Tamils (d) Anglo-Indians

Ans. (d)

Q.7. Which language was declared as the only official language of Sri Lanka by an Act passed

in 1956?

(a) Tamil (b) Sinhala (c) Hindi (d) English

Ans. (b)

Q.8. Which is the state religion of Sri Lanka?

(a) Buddhism (b) Hinduism (c) Islam (d) Christianity

Ans. (a)

Q.9. Which of the following was not one of the initial demands of the Sri Lankan Tamils?

(a) Recognition of Tamil as an official language

(b) Regional autonomy

(c) Equality of opportunity in securing jobs and education

(d) Creation of an independent Tamil Eelam (state)

Ans. (d)

Q.10. Which of the following statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium are correct?

(i) Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government

(ii) The state governments are not subordinate to the central government

(iii) Brussels has a separate government in which both the communities have equal representation

(iv) The ‘community government’ is elected by people belonging to one linguistic community.

(a) 1, 2, 4 (b) 1, 2, 3, 4 (c) 1, 3, 4 (d) 1, 2, 3

Ans. (b)

Q.11. Which of the statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri Lanka

are correct?

(a) In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the minority French-speaking people

(b) In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of the Sinhala-speaking majority

(c) The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power-sharing to protect their culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs

(d) The transformation of Belgium from a unitary government to a federal one prevented the division of country on linguistic lines.

Ans. (d)

Q.12. Choose the incorrect statement.

(a) Belgium and Sri Lanka are democracies

(c) Majoritarian Government (d) Prudential Government

Ans. (c)

Q.6. Power sharing is good because:

(a) It increases the conflict between social groups

(b) It ensures the instability of political order

(c) It reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups

(d) It leads to violence

Ans. (c)

Q.7. In which one of the following year Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country?

 (a) 1947 (b) 1948 (c) 1948 (d) 1950

Ans. (b)

Q.8. Which one of the following systems of power sharing is called checks and balances?

 (a) Horizontal distribution of powers

(b) Federal division of powers

(c) Separation of powers

(d) Power shared among different levels of government

Ans. (a)

Q.9. How many times the Constitution of Belgium was amended between 1970 and 1993?

 (a) Two times (b) Three times (c) Five times (d) Four times

Ans. (d)

Q.10. ‘Sri Lankan Tamil’ refers to which of the following? [2010(T-1)]

(a) Tamil Muslim (b) Tamil native of the country

(c) Tamil whose forefathers came from India in the colonial period

(d) Tamil Hindu

Ans. (b)

Q.11. Which of the following languages is not spoken in Belgium?

(a) French (b) Dutch (c) Danish (d) German

Ans. (c)

Q.12. When different parties share power to form a government, it is called?

 (a) Majoritarian (b) Federal (c) Community (d) Coalition

Ans. (d)

Q.13. Which of the following was not a provision of the Act of 1956 passed in Sri Lanka?

 (a) Sinhala was recognized as the only official language

(b) Buddhism was to be protected by the state

(c) Provinces were given autonomy

(d) Sinhalas were favoured in government jobs

Ans. (c)

Q.14. Power can be shared in modern democracies in the following ways :

(a) Among different organs of the government (b) Among various levels

(c) Among different social groups (d) All the above

Ans. (d)

Q.15. Which of the following is an example of horizontal sharing of power?

(a) Power sharing between different states

(b) Power sharing between different organs of the government

(c) Power sharing between different levels of the government

(d) Power sharing between different political parties

Ans. (b)

Q.16. Which one of the following communities constituted majority in Brussels?

(a) French Speaking (b) Dutch Spekaing (c) German Speaking (d) None of them

Ans. (a)

Q.17. In the city of Brussels

(a) 80% people speak French while 20% speak Dutch

(b) 80% people speak Dutch while 20% speak French

(c) 80% people speak German while 20% speak French

(d) 80% people speak German while 20% speak Dutch

Ans. (a)

Q.18. Which of the following statements is not true?

(a) In Belgium, leaders realised that unity of the country is possible only by sharing power

(b) In Sri Lanka, the majority community wants to force domination over others

(c) In Sri Lanka, the demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by Tamils has been granted

(d) Division of Belgium along linguistic lines was averted due to power sharing

Ans. (c)

Q.19. Who elects the community government in Belgium?

(a) People belonging to one language community only

(b) By the leader of Belgium

(c) The citizens of the whole country

(d) The community leaders to Belgium

Ans. (a)

Q.20. In which one of the following countries principle of majority Arianism led to civil war?

 (a) Pakistan (b) Sri Lanka (c) Belgium (d) India

Ans. (b)

Q.21. Division of powers between higher and lower levels of government is called

(a) horizontal distribution (b) parallel distribution

(c) vertical division (d) diagonal division

Ans. (c)

Q.22. Which two languages are generally spoken in Belgium?

(a) French and English (b) Dutch and English

(c) French and Dutch (d) Dutch and Sinhala

Ans. (c)

Q.23. Which one of the following is not a valid reason for power sharing?

(a) for majority Arianism (b) being part and parcel of democracy

(c) to reduce tensions (d) for political stability

Ans. (a)

Q.24. The Government in which power is shared by two or more political parties, is known as :

(a) Community Government (b) Unitary Government

(c) Federal Government (d) Coalition Government

Ans. (c)

Q.25. Which of the following ethnic groups in Belgium has the largest population?

(a) Walloon (b) Flemish (c) German (d) None of the above

Ans. (b)

Q.26. Tamil natives of Sri Lanka are called :

(a) Sri Lankan Tamils (b) Indian Tamils (c) Muslim Tamils (d) None of the above

Ans. (a)

Q.27. Among the following countries to which one do ‘Indian Tamils’ belong to :

(a) Belgium (b) Germany (c) Sri Lanka (d) France

Ans. (c)

Q.28. Which one of the following communities is not related to Sri Lanka?

(a) Sinhalas (b) Indian Tamils (c) Parsis (d) Sri Lankan Tamils

Ans. (c)

Q.29. What is the percentage of German-speaking people in Belgium ?

(a) 59 (b) 40 (c) 60 (d) 10

Ans. (d)

Q.30. Which one of the following statements about coalition Government is true?

 (a) Power is shared among the different organs of the government

(b) Power is shared among governments at different levels

(c) Power is shared by different social groups

(d) Power is shared by two or more political parties

Ans. (d)

Q.31. Which one of the following statements about community government is true?

 (a) Power is shared among different organs of the government

(b) Power is shared among governments at different levels

(c) Power is shared by different social groups

(d) Power is shared by two or more political parties

Ans. (c)

Q.32. Power sharing is desirable because it helps

(a) to increase pressure on government

(b) to reduce possibilities of conflicts

(c) to generate awareness among people

(d) to increase percentage of votes

Ans. (b)

Q.33. Which major social group constituted the largest share in population of Sri Lanka?

 (a) Sinhalas (b) Sri Lankan Tamils

(c) Indian Tamils (d) Muslims

Ans. (a)

Q.34. Which one of the following is the only official language of Sri Lanka?

(a) English (b) Hindi (c) Tamil (d) Sinhala

Ans. (d)

Q.35. Power is shared among different political parties that represent

(a) different candidates (b) same ideologies

(c) different ideologies and social groups (d) none of these

Ans. (c)

 

SHORT ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS

 

Q.1. Give three reasons for the civil war in Sri Lanka.

Ans. The distrust between the Sinhala and Tamil communities turned into a civil war due to the following reasons :

(a) Sinhala was declared as the only official language disregarding Tamil.

(b) Sinhala applicants were favoured for government jobs and higher positions in military and

bureaucracy. (c) Buddhism was declared as the official religion.

Q.2. Why is power-sharing desirable in a democracy or any other system of government?

Ans. (a) Power-sharing helps to reduce the possibiltiy of conflict between social groups.

(b) It is a good way to ensure the stability of political order and unity of the nation.

(c) A legitimate government is one where citizens through participation acquire a stake in the

system.

Q.3. Describe the power-sharing in Lebanon.

Ans. As per the agreement :

(a) President must belong to the Maronite sect of Catholic Christians.

(b) The Pime Minister must be from the Sunni Muslim community.

(c) The post of Deputy Prime Minister is fixed for Orthodox Christian sect and that of the speaker for Shia Muslim.

(d) The Christians agreed not to seek French protection and the Muslims agreed not to seek unification with Syria.

 

PREVIOUS YEARS’ QUESTIONS

 

Q.1. Describe with examples the way in which power can be shared among different social and linguistic groups?

Ans. Power may also be shared among different social groups, such as religious and linguistic

groups, for example, Belgium. In Belgium, this different social group is known as community

government. In some countries there are constitutional and legal arrangements whereby

socially weaker sections and women are represented in the legislature and administration. This

type of arrangement is meant to give space in the government and administration to diverse

social groups who otherwise would feel alienated from the government.

Q.2. Describe horizontal and vertical power sharing in modern democracies.

Ans. When power is shared among legislature, executive and judiciary different organs of

government. This is known as horizontal distribution of power. This kind of distribution allows

different organs of government placed at the same level to exercise different powers. It this

pattern, each organ checks the others. This maintains the balance of power, for example, in

India.

When power shared among governments at different levels, at provincial or regional level, this

is known as vertical distribution of power. Such a general government for the entire country

is usually called federal government. In India, we refer to it as the central or union government.

The governments at the provincial or regional level are called by different names in different

countries. In India, we call them state governments.

Q.3. What is the difference between the policies adopted by Belgium and Sri Lanka regarding

power sharing arrangement?

OR

How have Belgium and Sri Lanka dealt with the question of power sharing differently.

Ans. The ethnic composition of Belgium is very complex. The Belgium Constitution prescribes that

the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government.

Some special laws require the support of majority of members from each linguistic group. Thus

no single community can make decisions unilaterally. Many powers of the central government

has been given to state governments but the state governments are not subordinate to the

central government. Brussels (the capital) has a separate government in which both the

communities have equal representation.

Apart from the central and the state government, there is a third kind of government. This

community government is elected by people belonging to one language community. It has the

power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issues.

In Sri Lanka, two major social groups are there – Sinhala speakers (74%) and Tamil speakers

(18%). The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government.

As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of majoritarian.

Under it, Sinhala is recognised as the only official language. The government followed Sinhala

preferential policies. The state shall protect and foster Buddhism.

As a result, the relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time.

Q.4. Explain how Belgium was able to solve her ethnic problem.

Ans. The Belgian leaders amended their Constitution four times between 1970 and 1993, to work

out an arrangement agreeable to all sections of society.

(i) The number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers are equal in the central government.

(ii) Many powers of the central government have been given to state government of the two

regions of the country.

(iii) The state governments are not subordinate to the central government.

(iv) Brussels has a separate government in which both the communities have equal

representation.

(v) The ‘Community Government’ is elected by people belonging to one language

community–Dutch, French and German-speaking – no matter where they live.

Q.5. What were the reasons for the alienation of Sri Lankan Tamils? What was the effect of

this on Sri Lankan Tamils? What was the effect of this on the country?

Ans. (i) In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus

disregarding Tamil.

(ii) The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for

positions in educational institutions, armed forces and other government jobs.

(iii) A new constitution declared that the state shall protect and promote Buddhism, the

religion of the majority Sinhala community.

All these government measures gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri

Lankan Tamils.

Q.6. Explain two reasons as why power sharing is desirable.

Ans. (i) Power sharing is desirable because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between

social groups. Since social conflicts eventually lead to political instability, power sharing

ensures the stability of the political order.

(ii) Powers sharing is the very spirit of democracy. A legitimate government is one where

citizens through participation, acquire a stake in the system.

Q.7. Write one prudential and one moral reason for power sharing.

Ans. (i) Prudential reason for power sharing — Power sharing reduces social conflicts among

social groups with different interests and aspirations. Social conflicts lead to violence and

instability. Power sharing ensures the stability of political order.

(ii) Moral reason for power sharing — power sharing is the very spirit and essence of

democracy. Democracy involves sharing power with those affected by its exercise, and

who have to live with its effects. People have the right to be consulted on how they are

to be governed.

LONG ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS

 

Q1. Describe the different forms of power-sharing in modern democracies. Give an example

of each of these. (CBSE Sample Paper)

Ans. In modern democracies, power-sharing arrangements can take many forms –

(i) Among different organs of government : Power is shared among the legislature,

executive and judiciary. This is called horizontal distribution of power because it allows

the three organs of government placed at the same level to exercise different powers. Each

organ checks the others, no organ can exercise unlimited power.

(ii) Among governments at different levels : Here power is shared among governments at

the provincial or regional level and a general government for the entire country, called

Federal Government. In India, we call it Central or Union Government. In India, the

government at the provincial level is called State government. The Constitution clearly

lays down powers of different levels of government. The third level of government is

called municipality and panchayat. This arrangement is called vertical division of power.

(iii) Among different social groups : Power may also be shared among different social

groups, such as the religious and linguistic groups. For example, Community Government

in Belgium. In India, weaker sections of society have ‘reserved constituencies’ in

Assemblies and the Parliament. They also have ‘reserved seats’ in government jobs.

(iv) Among political parties, pressure groups and movements :

Power is shared among various political parties that represent different ideologies and

social groups. Interest groups such as those of traders, businessmen, industrialists,

farmers and individual workers also have share in governmental power, either through

participation in governmental committees or bringing influence on the decision

making process.

Q.2. Bring out the main features of the Belgian model of governance.

Ans. Between 1970 and 1993, the Belgian leaders amended their Constitution four times to work

out a consensus.

(i) The Belgian Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking

ministers shall be equal in the central government. Important laws can be passed only with

the support of majority of members from each linguistic group.

(ii) Many powers of the central government have been delegated to state governments of the

two regions of the country. The State governments are not subordinate to the central

government.

(iii)Brussels has a separate government in which both the communities have equal

representation.

Apart from the central and the state governments, there is a third kind of government in

Belgium, called the ‘Community government’. This government is elected by the people

belonging to one language community – Dutch, French and German-speaking – no matter

where they live.

Q.3. What do we learn from the story of Sri Lanka? Should India follow the Belgian model?

(HOTS)

Ans. The distrust between the two communities in Sri Lanka turned into a widespread conflict. It

soon turned into a civil war in which thousands of people of both the communities were killed,

thousands became homeless and were forced to leave the country as refugees. The story of Sri

Lanka teaches us the lesson of sharing power among various communities. Various prudential

and moral reasons for power sharing are desirable to ensure stability of the political order,

unity and integrity of the country. The rule of majority community leads to conflict in society

and eventually to a bloody civil war.

India should not follow the Belgian model as it is not suitable for a large multilingual and multi religious

country like ours. Our Constitution is best suited and most appropriate for Indian society

and culture. Belgian model of power sharing is quite complicated and not suitable for India.

Q.4. What could ethnic problem lead to in Belgium and Sri Lanka?

Ans. In both countries, there could be tension and conflict between different ethnic groups. In

Belgium, the majority community of Dutch-speaking people could try to dominate the French

and German-speaking people. This could lead to conflict — specially in Brussels. Brussels

could have been partitioned as the ratio of the Dutch and the French was different from the

rest of the country.

In Sri Lanka, the Sinhalese people, already in majority, could try further to dominate the Tamils peaking

people. It could even lead to a war.

Thus, size and population do not matter. Ethnic divisions, if not handled with patience and

common sense, can lead to a civil war, division of the country and conflict between

communities.

Q.5. Give instances to show how Sri Lanka has imposed ‘majority Arianism’.

Ans. (i) Sri Lanka had a 74% population of Sinhala-speaking people. From the day it became

independent, it imposed the majority rule in Sri Lanka.

(ii) It changed the Constitution to make Sinhala the official language, Buddhism the official

religion.

(iii) It totally ignored Tamil culture, language, and gave preference in jobs to Sinhala-speaking

people.

(iv) It also gave no importance to Hinduism, Islam or Christianity.

Q.6. In what way was the Belgian method better?

Ans. The Belgians gave equal importance to all the ethnic groups. At the Centre, there were both

French and Dutch ministers, and their number was equal.

The Centre and the states had equal and independent powers.

If new laws were made, they had to be passed with the majority in both ethnic groups-voting

for them.

A separate government was elected for the city of Brussels.

A third community government was elected, comprising Dutch, French and Germans peaking

people. It looked after the language, culture and educational issues.

In short, the Belgians wisely tried to avoid all tensions and conflicts by accommodating the

needs and wishes of all ethnic groups.

Q.7. Here are some examples of power-sharing. Which of the four types of power sharing do

these represent ? Who is sharing power with whom?

(i) The Bombay High Court ordered the Maharashtra state government to immediately take

action and improve the living conditions for the 2,000-odd children at seven children’s

homes in Maharashtra.

(ii) The government of Ontario state in Canada has agreed to a land claim settlement with the

aboriginal community. The Minister responsible for Native Affairs announced that the

government will work with aboriginal people in a spirit of mutual respect and cooperation.

(iii) Russia’s two influential political parties, The Union of Right Forces and the Liberal

Yabloko Movement, agreed to unite their organizations into a strong right-wing coalition.

They propose to have a common list of candidates in the next parliamentary elections.

(iv) The finance ministers of various states in Nigeria got together and demanded that the

federal government declare its sources of income. They also wanted to know the formula

by which the revenue is distributed among various state governments.

Ans. (i) The state judiciary is exercising its power to control the state executive by asking the state

government to look into the conditions of its 2,000 children’s home. There is no powersharing

between different organs of government.

(ii) The aboriginal people have exercised pressure on the government to agree to their land

claims. So power is shared by a social group with the government.

(iii) In this case, two political parties have formed a coalition and are sharing power with

mutual consent.

(iv) In the last example, power is being shared at different government levels, the state or

regional groups are demanding the government at the Centre to declare its sources of

income, so that they can have a larger share of finances for their respective states.

Q.8. How has the idea of power-sharing changed with time?

Ans. For a long time, it was believed that all power of a government must reside in one person or

group of persons located at one place. It was felt that dispensing powers would delay in

decision-making and their enforcement. But these notions have changed with the emergence

of democracy. One basic principle of democracy is that people are the source of all political

power. In a good democratic government, due respect is given to diverse groups and views that

exist in a society. Everyone has a voice in the shaping of the public policies.

Q.9. One of the ways in which power-sharing is done in Indian democracy is by providing

reservations for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and OBCs. Now the Muslims

and Christian dalits are asking for reservations. Is this demand of power sharing

justified? (HOTS)

Ans. Initially, when the reservation of seats was done for the socially weaker sections, the intention

of the Constitution was to bring an end to the alienation being faced by the so-called weaker

communities, and to bring them at par with the other communities. But in my opinion, it has

now become more of a political gimmick, a means to collect votes, than to genuinely work for

their development. It may encourage more and more communities to demand for reservations,

thus leading to widening of social division. This is a sort of negative power-sharing in my

opinion. Some more positive steps need to be taken to encourage power-sharing as early as

possible.

 

PREVIOUS YEARS’ QUESTIONS

 

Q.1. Describe any three demands of the Sri Lankan Tamils. How did they struggle for their demands?

Ans. The demands of the Sri Lankan Tamils are :

(i) recognition of Tamil as an official language

(ii) regional autonomy

(iii) equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs

In order to struggle for their demands, they launched parties and struggles. By 1980s, several

political organisations were formed, demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (state) in northern

and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. This struggle turned into a widespread conflict, leading to a

civil war.

Q.2. What is majority Arianism? How has it increased the feelings of alienation among Sri Lankan Tamils? Explain with examples.

Ans. ‘Majoritarianism’ refers to the policy of domination over minority, just by the virtue of being

in majority.

In Sri Lanka, it has led to the feelings of alienation among the Tamils. They feel that none of

the major political parties, led by Buddhist Sinhala leaders are sensitive to their language and

culture. According to them, the Constitution and the government policies have denied them

equal political rights and discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and

ignored their interests.

This alienation among the Tamils is due to the following reasons :

(i) In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus

disregarding Tamil.

(ii) The government framed policies favouring Sinhala people for government jobs.

(iii) The new Constitution specified that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism.